String array=new String[]; and String array=new String[]{}; both are invalid statement in java. It will gives you an error that you are trying to assign String array to String datatype.
String Literals: Moreover, a string literal always refers to the same instance of class String. This is because string literals - or, more generally, strings that are the values of constant expressions (§15.28) - are "interned" so as to share unique instances, using the method String.intern. Similar examples can also be found in JLS 3.10.5-1.
String stands for System.String and it is a .NET Framework type. string is an alias in the C# language for System.String. Both of them are compiled to System.String in IL (Intermediate Language), so there is no difference.
In String Interpolation, we simply prefix the string with a $ (much like we use the @ for verbatim strings). Then, we simply surround the expressions we want to interpolate with curly braces (i.e. { and }): It looks a lot like the String.Format () placeholders, but instead of an index, it is the expression itself inside the curly braces.
I want to get a new string from the third character to the end of the string, e.g. myString[2:end]. If omitting the second part means 'to the end', and if you omit the first part, does it start fro...
I recently was introduced to a large codebase and noticed all string comparisons are done using String.Equals() instead of == What's the reason for this, do you think?
return s; } // Trim from both ends (copying) inline std::string trim_copy(std::string s) { trim(s); return s; } For C++03 To address some comments about accepting a parameter by reference, modifying and returning it. I agree. An implementation that I would likely prefer would be two sets of functions, one for in place and one which makes a copy.
6 One thing that is not covered here is that it depends if we compare string to c string, c string to string or string to string. A major difference is that for comparing two strings size equality is checked before doing the compare and that makes the == operator faster than a compare. here is the compare as i see it on g++ Debian 7
For example in a string sentence, position of e is 1, 4, 7 (because indexing usually starts from zero). but what I find is both of the functions find() and index() returns first position of a character.
